Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory47.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateApr 09 '20 at 20:54
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 85.9
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 204
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 718
68% 561 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 119
Parallax 99.3
90% 110 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 102
Splatting 107
85% 103 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
640GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 410 418 412 417 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 423
Mixed 409
SusWrite 391
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 50
166% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 284
235% 337 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1030 1131 1153 1148 1131 1126 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,905
Write 1739
Mixed 754
SusWrite 1120
308% 1,380 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 52.9
206% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 775
DQ Write 479
DQ Mixed 634
471% 629 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 235%
Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
148GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 312 316 318 318 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 471
Mixed 375
SusWrite 329
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 57.1
187% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 358
268% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 114%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
696GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 135 134 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 168
Write 124
Mixed 85
SusWrite 135
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
232% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 CMK32GX4M2B3000C15 CMU32GX4M2C3000C15 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23.5
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback