Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	76.8% Very good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 188 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 359 8-Core 535 56% 447 Pts	64-Core 573 36% 573 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD FirePro V4900-$150 2,218 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Dell(1028 240A) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1701.0 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	7.06% Terrible	Lighting 8.9 Reflection 8.85 Parallax 7.06 7% 8.27 fps	MRender 9.29 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 8.74 7% 8.12 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.06% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 291GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 305 288 276 298 291 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Read 406 Write 336 Mixed 321 SusWrite 302 77% 341 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 74.5 4K Mixed 32.9 117% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 60.3 85% 156 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-056.A00LF 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-056.A00LF 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	53.3% Above average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 15.5 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 16.9 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	35x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	25x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GBKingstonBench 61%, 11,630 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	8x

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $239