Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$41 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 118 2-Core 210 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 308 42% 311 Pts	64-Core 309 19% 309 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 3 2% 3.01 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 3.4 Splatting 5.35 4% 4.66 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 597 428 408 410 408 410 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	220% Outstanding	Read 2004 Write 1,916 Mixed 1,254 SusWrite 444 313% 1,404 MB/s	4K Read 53.8 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 77.1 249% 87 MB/s	DQ Read 864 DQ Write 704 DQ Mixed 842 614% 803 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 220% Great: 302%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 848GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 141 151 144 153 147 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 139 Write 111 Mixed 52.1 SusWrite 144 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 94% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 113%
Packard Bell Carbon 1TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 559GB free, PID 002d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	2.33% Terrible	Read 6.7 Write 6 Mixed 5 SusWrite 4.8 8% 5.62 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 2.33% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 859B CT4G4DFS824A.C8FHP 859B CT8G4DFD824A.C16FE 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192 MB Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.5% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 28.4 MC Mixed 26.1 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 24.2 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	107x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	94x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	92x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	150x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	131x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	89x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $480

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16