Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$57 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 73.2 1-Core 88.7 2-Core 189 66% 117 Pts	4-Core 269 8-Core 269 36% 269 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 3 (Ryzen iGPU) 18,674 User benchmarks, average bench 5% AMD(1002 15DD) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 5.53 Reflection 11 Parallax 6.84 4% 7.78 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 0.04 3% 3.61 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 54 11 32 74 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 420 Write 212 Mixed 117 SusWrite 64.6 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 21.9 4K Mixed 9.5 51% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 64.3 DQ Write 79.8 DQ Mixed 41.5 40% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston M378A1K43BB2-CRC 1x8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 15.9 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 14.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	487x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	460x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,369x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	490x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16