Today's hottest deals

Seneca PRO687949

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSeneca PRO687949  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B250M-C
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$100
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 254
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 701
73% 588 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 62.1
58% 67.9 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 66.3
Splatting 66.2
55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 293 299 300 300 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 438
Mixed 377
SusWrite 299
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 62
201% 73.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 352
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: MJ6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 152 152 153 152 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 150
Write 156
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 153
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 87%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HUS726020ALA614 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: A5GNW907
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 184 195 190 188 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 200
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 188
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
210% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W642GU42J5213N8 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback