Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-K (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160520
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '17 at 08:52
Run Duration	88 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$130 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	87% Excellent	Memory 92.1 1-Core 125 2-Core 243 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 475 63% 474 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E215) 1GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 18.2 Parallax 24.4 15% 20.4 fps	MRender 14.8 Gravity 17.5 Splatting 20.9 15% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01S01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 141 140 3916 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 116 (05) Reallocated sector count 197 197 77 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27015 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 115 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 43 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 72 (C2) HDA temperature 99 88 44 (C4) Reallocation count 198 198 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.6% Good	Read 120 Write 115 Mixed 120 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.42 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905622-024.A00G 2x4GB 435 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	MC Read 28.2 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 23 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.2 67% 23.5 GB/s	Latency 63.9 63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,934 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	1,119x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	641x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	554x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	844x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	470x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	368x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	314x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	163x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	156x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	113x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	80x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16