Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	91.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 (all builds)
Memory	40.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140319
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	May 19 '20 at 21:04
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3820 38,674 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 180 63% 110 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 476 52% 410 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% PNY(196E 1215) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	91.4% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 130 Parallax 134 94% 126 fps	MRender 92.9 Gravity 121 Splatting 103 87% 106 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 821GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 14 13 16 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 22.3 Write 15 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 13.6 11% 15.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 107%
Seagate ST500DM0 ST500DM005 HD502 500GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 85GB free Firmware: 1AJ1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 123 Write 136 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 85.1 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.2 224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 105GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 91 89 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 140 Write 139 Mixed 75 SusWrite 89.8 81% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 48GB free Firmware: 1AG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 91 91 91 91 92 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 86.7 Write 96.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 91.7 59% 81 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$79 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 52GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 105 104 108 103 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 102 Write 104 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 106 68% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 34GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 60 61 60 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 64.5 Write 64.5 Mixed 52.5 SusWrite 60.5 45% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 84%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 36GB free, PID 1042 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 41.8 Write 41.5 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 40.5 50% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA HDWD110 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 94GB free, PID 0578 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 104 103 103 104 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.6% Average	Read 89.5 Write 106 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 104 110% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-052.A 99U5471-052.A 99U5471-052.A 99U5471-052.A 99U5458-035.A 99U5471-052.A 48GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	66.2% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 24.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 10.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 899 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

CPU
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	281x
Core i7-4930KIntel $88Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	196x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	187x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	58x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	55x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	47x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	26x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	21x

RAM
DDR3 1866 4x4GBAdataBench 68%, 420 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 738 samples	16x
F3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 57%, 2,734 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16