Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive20.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120806
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 12:17
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 160
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 398
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 90.4
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 77.5
74% 83.5 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 73.6
70% 88.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tcsunbow X3 480GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1216A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 34 3.6 36 34 5.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.3% Poor
Read 290
Write 99.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 25.2
23% 106 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.5
26% 7.8 MB/s
DQ Read 5.6
DQ Write 2.1
DQ Mixed 0.1
1% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 99%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
898GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 113 112 113 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 73.2
Write 90.8
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 112
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 70%
ST350062 0AS 500GB
431GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 28.7
Mixed 23
SusWrite 28.7
37% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5x2GB
5 of 6 slots used
10GB DIMM
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback