Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-705

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-705  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-705
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 16:01
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$40
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 109
2-Core 195
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 290
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 705
Sapphire(174B 214A) 1GB
CLim: 873 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.11% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.97
2% 2.5 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.11%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X2128G 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQ61C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 115 70 71 70 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 426
Write 263
Mixed 291
SusWrite 123
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 25
116% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 198
170% 247 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-705 Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-705

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback