Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-605

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-605  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-605
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 09:23
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
LGA1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 187
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 362
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 705
Sapphire(174B 214A) 1GB
CLim: 873 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.5% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.27 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.5%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 94 60 56 124 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 168
Write 157
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 91.1
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 40 40 40 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
23% Poor
Read 38.4
Write 37.3
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 40.5
28% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-605 Builds (Compare 478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $235
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback