Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive441% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200413
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 18:05
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700B
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 141
2-Core 276
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 275
36% 272 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 15.1.4.47270
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 15
Parallax 86.4
31% 46.5 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 108
57% 63.7 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB
229GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 859 828 749 746 782 794 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
441% Outstanding
Read 7,062
Write 3,706
Mixed 3,893
SusWrite 793
852% 3,863 MB/s
4K Read 85.6
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 71.5
255% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 695
DQ Mixed 686
519% 696 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 441%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 30.1
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 33.8
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 27.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback