Dell Precision R7610

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive86.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision R7610  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 02MGJ2
Memory38.8 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190702
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 19:53
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 127
54% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 486
44% 370 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 274 280 249 275 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 474
Write 454
Mixed 370
SusWrite 290
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 37.9
123% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 254
191% 254 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 124%
Seagate ST91000640SS 1TB
646GB free
Firmware: XRAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 49 12 14 0.8 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 82.7
Mixed 13
SusWrite 25.2
26% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5773DH0-YK0 Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F M393B5773DH0-YK0 Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F M393B5773DH0-YK0 Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F M393B5773DH0-YK0 Micron 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F M393B5773DH0-YK0 Micron 36JSZF... 48GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 24.2
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 86.1
46% 86.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision R7610 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision R7610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback