Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,838 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 169 60% 105 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 539 49% 413 Pts	64-Core 810 50% 810 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Cisco UCSC-MRAID12G 2.5TB 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.3 9.3 9.8 8.3 7.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.3% Above average	Read 166 Write 9.2 Mixed 17.1 SusWrite 9 36% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 54% 0.3 MB/s

Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 2.8 3.2 2.8 2.8 2.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	4.23% Terrible	Read 19.5 Write 3.2 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 3.1 8% 7.78 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.23% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393A2K40BB1-CRC 2x16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 24 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (90^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.3% Above average	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 18.3 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 95.6 42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

SSD
UCSC-MRAID12G 299GBCiscoBench 239%, 1 sample	1x
UCSC-MRAID12G 1.5TBCiscoBench 294%, 3 samples	1x

RAM
HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 6x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 1 sample	1x
9965640-016.A00G 0xCE00 M393A1G40DB0-CPB 0xAD00 HMA42GR7AFR4N-TF 0xCE00 M393A1G40DB0-CPB 0xCE00 M393A1G40DB0-CPB 0xCE00 M393A1G40DB0-CPB 0xCE00 M393A1G40DB0-CPB 9965640-016.A00G 0xCE00 M393A1G40DB0-CPB 0xAD00 HMA42GR7AFR4N... 175GBKingstonBench 82%, 1 sample	1x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16