Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20MFCTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20MFCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20MFCTO1WW
Memory17.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200318
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 19:28
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 253
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 802
80% 651 Pts
64-Core 898
56% 898 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 2267) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7811
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.08% Terrible
Lighting 7.27
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 7.69
6% 15.2 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 6.7
Splatting 14.7
9% 11 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKKF512G8L 512GB
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: L13P
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,364
Write 1,416
Mixed 1,172
363% 1,651 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 85.3
259% 87.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,122
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 187
374% 758 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 269%
SD Card 61GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 34 31 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 47.5
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 33.8
65% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 6.2
454% 8.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 24.9
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 26.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20MFCTO1WW Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 20MFCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $230Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback