PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z210 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1587h |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160725 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Jun 16 '20 at 01:10 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 49% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E31230
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
61%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 301 310 308 311 312 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
334GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 104 107 97 93 107 MB/s
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
HGST Travelstar 7K750 2.5" 500GB-$59
52GB free
Firmware: JF3OA100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 43 41 42 41 MB/s
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial CT102472BD1339.M18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
43.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 341x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 121x |
Xeon E3-1240IntelBench 70%, 2,292 samples | 115x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 107x |
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples | 83x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 68x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $216 |