Asus X555LN

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 33% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus X555LN  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555LN
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 27 '20 at 15:20
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 57%
CPU Throttled 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 48.6
1-Core 41
2-Core 66.8
33% 52.1 Pts
4-Core 82.7
8-Core 84.7
11% 83.7 Pts
64-Core 93.4
6% 93.4 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 16CD) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3496
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 3.62
2% 5.33 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 1.67
Splatting 4.74
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
740GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 59 66 72 74 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 81.5
Write 65.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 66.8
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.5% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555LN Builds (Compare 470 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback