HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 249
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 792
75% 620 Pts
64-Core 1,007
62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
EVGA(3842 3162) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 124
Parallax 129
106% 128 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 117
Splatting 103
106% 134 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69
731GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1999 2119 1603 1528 1521 1518 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,124
Write 2,307
Mixed 1,647
SusWrite 1,714
439% 1,948 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 78
253% 85.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,148
DQ Write 885
DQ Mixed 1008
756% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 314%
Great: 410%
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$70
924GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 451 441 443 451 451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 451
Mixed 372
SusWrite 448
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 33.1
109% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 269
218% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
644GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 181 181 180 179 174 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 87.3
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 178
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 112%
G-raid Thunderbolt 3 20TB
18.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 461 454 456 461 459 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 432
Mixed 245
SusWrite 458
287% 391 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 3.4
1,180% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 256%
Great: 254%
Hitachi G-DRIVE with Thu 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 212 219 214 215 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 212
Write 209
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 214
131% 180 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X KHX2666C16/16G 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 33.8
MC Mixed 28.7
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 26
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback