Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 14 '20 at 10:27
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 82.3
2-Core 132
64% 102 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 320
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 305
19% 305 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.6
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 18.2
16% 17.7 fps
MRender 22.2
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 15.5
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$65
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 142
Write 173
Mixed 170
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 23
65% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 22
DQ Write 61.2
DQ Mixed 32.4
27% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 131
Write 134
Mixed 54.9
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 75%
WDC WD50 00AAKX-001CA0 500GB
466GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.2
Write 27.9
Mixed 26.6
36% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 42%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
902GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 28.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 3.2
28% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
42.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 16.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.9
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback