Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110926
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 27 '20 at 04:52
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 84
2-Core 173
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 341
46% 340 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.13%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 152 192 181 180 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 352
Write 173
Mixed 208
SusWrite 172
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 13.4
74% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.7
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 15.9
27% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HDT725032VLA380 320GB-$36
140GB free
Firmware: V54OA7BA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 69.5
Write 63.2
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 66.6
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 40%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
74GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 87 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 85.4
Write 81.4
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 86.2
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
178GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 66 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 114
Write 111
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 65.9
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 68%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
829GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 117 118 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 117
144% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 13.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $213
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback