Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.41% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 15 '20 at 02:39
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7167U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 146
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 246
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 5.96
Parallax 6.34
5% 6.14 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.26
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IND-S3MP/128G 128GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFCBBT3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 346 375 382 379 378 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 362
Write 377
Mixed 333
SusWrite 368
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 38.9
152% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 178
159% 238 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH5641G8FJ8NWRNSQG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.7% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 20.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 17.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback