Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151023
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '20 at 21:51
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 195
88% 146 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 444
64% 469 Pts
64-Core 553
34% 553 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
MSI(1462 3303) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2127 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 48
Reflection 55.4
Parallax 45
39% 49.5 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 48
Splatting 62.6
49% 59.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 509
Write 497
Mixed 376
103% 461 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 70.5
244% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD WD20EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
77GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 91 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 81.3
Write 81.8
Mixed 65
SusWrite 91.1
59% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 85%
Samsun HD501LJ 500GB
6GB free
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 79 79 80 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 75.3
Write 36
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 80.2
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 45%
Samsun HD103UJ 1TB
3GB free
Firmware: 1AA0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 64 71 66 62 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 54.8
Write 45
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 64.6
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 42.6
MC Mixed 36.6
112% 39.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $891
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback