Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-S2  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100706
Uptime19.9 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 19:59
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$200
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 182
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 414
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT
Gigabyte(1458 3417) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.92
Parallax 0.44
1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 226 226 228 228 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.4% Above average
Read 234
Write 233
Mixed 218
SusWrite 227
52% 228 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 21.1
86% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 184
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
294GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.9% Good
Read 122
Write 121
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 114
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Toshiba External USB 3.0 1TB
296GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 91 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 71.3
Write 70.2
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 90.8
95% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H55M-S2 Builds (Compare 289 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback