Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690-$80 73,695 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 223 78% 139 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 423 58% 429 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Elitegroup(1019 7E1C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	3.66% Terrible	Lighting 3.73 Reflection 6.04 Parallax 5.94 3% 5.24 fps	MRender 7.76 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 7.26 5% 5.81 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.66% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
IND-GOW-R120G 120GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 5.5 27 7.5 5.5 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Read 466 Write 23 Mixed 19 SusWrite 15.7 28% 131 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.1 49% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 277GB free Firmware: A750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 169 158 148 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 144 Mixed 38 SusWrite 164 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Samsung M378B5173CB0-CK0 12GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.6% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 12.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	6x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

RAM
99U5474-038.A00LF 0218 0118 1311 M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG 10GBKingstonBench 37%, 5 samples	4x
99U5474-026.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 1,756 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $152