Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateSep 04 '20 at 05:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 666
64% 530 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.30.28
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 26.1
14% 19.8 fps
MRender 6.19
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 23.2
16% 18.1 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IND-GOW-R120G 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200326
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 347 163 16 13 3.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 484
Write 369
Mixed 347
SusWrite 146
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 14.6
114% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 18.5
65% 136 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
815GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 181 184 187 187 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 146
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 185
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 106%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
OCPC MMX3A2K16GD430C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback