Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '20 at 02:48
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.35 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 75.9 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 140 58% 96.9 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 456 43% 359 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% EVGA(3842 5671) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 122 Reflection 134 Parallax 121 100% 126 fps	Gravity 123 Splatting 105 100% 114 fps
Poor: 86% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD easystore 240GB 2,807 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: EF430400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 129 145 151 148 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	Read 431 Write 355 Mixed 168 SusWrite 157 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 15.3 66% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 82.3 DQ Mixed 17.9 35% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 57%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 863GB free Firmware: MS2OA810 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 185 183 184 185 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 182 Write 176 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 184 104% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB 256 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.7% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 88.6 45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588