Today's hottest deals

Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory8.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150709
Uptime3.3 Days
Run DateAug 20 '20 at 21:30
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 192
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 528
53% 430 Pts
64-Core 540
34% 540 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 455.41
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 53.5
57% 63.4 fps
MRender 72.1
Gravity 71.5
Splatting 73.2
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS1TSSD370S 1TB
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 327 369 387 382 397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 461
Write 407
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 350
68% 307 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 8.9
61% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 196
134% 169 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 110%
Samsung 840 250GB-$239
43GB free
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 248 248 248 248 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 442
Write 255
Mixed 162
SusWrite 244
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 22.3
102% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 57.9
103% 207 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 158 159 157 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 154
Mixed 105
SusWrite 158
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 101%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
912GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 121 123 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 122
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $304
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback