Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 78.6 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 192 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 466 49% 394 Pts	64-Core 500 31% 500 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 10.8 12% 13.3 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 13.4 Splatting 15.5 11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,135 Write 4,412 Mixed 4,639 1,054% 4,729 MB/s	4K Read 447 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 214 1,042% 278 MB/s	DQ Read 1,042 DQ Write 431 DQ Mixed 550 456% 674 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 133%
Generic- Compact Flash 32GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 29GB free, PID 6361 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	9% Terrible	Read 30.6 Write 20 Mixed 16.4 SusWrite 19.1 27% 21.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 13% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 28GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.8% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 16.5 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 17 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16