Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 77.7 1-Core 84.2 2-Core 162 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 439 46% 366 Pts	64-Core 463 29% 463 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 10.8 12% 13.3 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 13.4 Splatting 15.6 11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$372 7,241 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,486 Write 4363 Mixed 4688 1,079% 4,846 MB/s	4K Read 442 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 205 1,018% 269 MB/s	DQ Read 1,082 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 537 443% 657 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73QH0-CK0 28GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.9% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 16.6 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.2 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 84.9 47% 84.9 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16