PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B25 |
Motherboard | MSI B360-F PRO (MS-7B25) (all builds) |
Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190325 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 05 '20 at 10:08 |
Run Duration | 183 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Celeron G4920
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1130 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.8.3
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.4%
Average
|
|||
Intel UHD Graphics 610
MSI(1462 7B25) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7990
|
1.76%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 180 244 81 15 21 MB/s
|
27.4%
Poor
|
|||
Intenso Sata III 120GB
83GB free
Firmware: P0510E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 62 56 54 54 54 MB/s
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
231GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 88 89 87 89 MB/s
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 150 152 153 151 151 MB/s
|
86.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 28x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 17x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 9x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 9x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 9x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $325 |