Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1840-$69 7,524 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	49.5% Average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 140 55% 92.3 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 147 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3546) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 0.56 2% 1.85 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2 2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9250410AS 250GB-$42 8,782 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: D005SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 68 74 82 79 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 91.5 Write 88.7 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 74.1 54% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KVT8FP-HYC 1311 NT4GC64B88B1NF-DI 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.6% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 11.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	88x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	87x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	35x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	34x

RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	39x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	34x
Value DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 5,391 samples	25x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $245