Today's hottest deals

Viglen DQ57TM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemViglen DQ57TM  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 20 '20 at 14:09
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$40
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 82
2-Core 127
56% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 207
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.6% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 80
Parallax 111
51% 84.4 fps
MRender 76
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 63.7
59% 73 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427BNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 165 141 182 168 179 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.5% Above average
Read 223
Write 196
Mixed 213
SusWrite 167
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 50.1
4K Mixed 28.9
100% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 27.2
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 41.6
35% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 114%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB
414GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 19 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 18.8
Mixed 16
SusWrite 20.1
26% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 223%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.2 7.8 8.2 8 8.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 22
Write 8.3
Mixed 7
SusWrite 8
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.1
141% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KP223C-ELD 9905458-009.A00LF KP223C-ELD 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.4% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ57TM Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Viglen DQ57TM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback