HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '20 at 14:48
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 67
2-Core 108
49% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 205
28% 206 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1497) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.02% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 0.97
1% 1.15 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.02%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 62 61 57 59 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 79.4
Write 90.8
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 67.4
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Orbit 8GB
7GB free, PID 557c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 1.6 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
9.9% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 10.8
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 2.8
12% 10.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
99% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Kingston HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.1
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 1,625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback