Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 06 '20 at 10:49
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 89
2-Core 180
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 358
40% 317 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 369.09
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.91% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.41
4% 4.29 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 7.04
4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 146 43 43 60 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.3% Very poor
Read 150
Write 83.7
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 68.1
21% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 9.3
27% 9.53 MB/s
DQ Read 10.2
DQ Write 16.2
DQ Mixed 11.2
9% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 102%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 6.1 6.9 6.7 6.5 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Read 16.1
Write 7.5
Mixed 12
SusWrite 6.4
13% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 19.1
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback