Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory2.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090825
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 07 '20 at 20:37
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 B55
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 85.9
40% 63.3 Pts
4-Core 83.6
8-Core 75.8
11% 79.7 Pts
64-Core 78.8
5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 384MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.59% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.75 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.27
Splatting 1.43
1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.59%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$30
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 28 23 23 18 32 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 3.3
Write 32
Mixed 93
SusWrite 27.3
9% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 9.8
26% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 36.5
DQ Mixed 9.1
12% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 00 Atermiter 44GB
1333, 0 MHz
8192, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.1
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback