Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory4.9 GB free of 10.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110802
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 22:41
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 B55
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 77
1-Core 43
2-Core 85.2
45% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 83.3
8-Core 80.4
11% 81.9 Pts
64-Core 83.2
5% 83.2 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
HP(103C 3047) 368MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 0.7
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$59
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP64
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 97.8
Write 94.2
Mixed 57.3
62% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9905471-001.A01LF ID:01 98 9905471-001.A01LF ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 43GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 33792 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.3% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 10
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.4
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback