Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200904
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 13 '20 at 20:58
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5350U
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 93.4
45% 73.2 Pts
4-Core 90.8
8-Core 65.1
11% 77.9 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 16.0.1.48919
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.33
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 7.88
5% 6.06 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 7.61
4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB
227GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 84 109 102 104 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 413
Write 132
Mixed 175
SusWrite 104
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 8.7
4K Mixed 1.7
42% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 72.1
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 99.4
70% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 8 slots used
4GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 2.1
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 8.9
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 11.9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,053 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback