Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory16.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 02:02
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 491
50% 405 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 134 119 111 111 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 312
Write 165
Mixed 208
SusWrite 119
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 25.3
85% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 112
101% 150 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
671GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 90 85 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 132
Write 123
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 89.7
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 76%
Generic MassStorageClass 64GB
53GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 86.9
Write 79.2
Mixed 60.2
94% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.9
248% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 128GB-$37
119GB free, PID 5588
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 229 235 233 233 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 262
Write 245
Mixed 188
SusWrite 231
310% 231 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 9.3
742% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.4
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 11.5
873% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 126%
Great: 123%
Memorex Roto Drive 401B 1GB
1GB free, PID 1a03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.97% Terrible
Read 16.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.7
7% 6.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.97%
Great: 5%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9
9GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 91.2
Write 47.6
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 47
70% 57 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.4
93% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback