Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	95.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3720QM-$100 9,911 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 192 70% 123 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 470 54% 421 Pts	64-Core 479 30% 479 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K1000M 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F6) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 900GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 437 443 441 445 440 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 441 Mixed 423 SusWrite 442 100% 442 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 46.1 4K Mixed 33.6 108% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 362 272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 133%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 31GB free Firmware: MU01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 410 Write 382 Mixed 287 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 21.2 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 28.7 94% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 237 203% 296 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ81UG8BBU0-GN-F Kingston 9905428-095.D00LF 16GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 18.1 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 82.1 49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	67x
Quadro K1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 4,204 samples	29x
Quadro K2000MNvidiaBench 6%, 4,288 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GBCorsairBench 56%, 247 samples	7x
M471B1G73BH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 290 samples	6x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	5x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $309

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16