Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive146% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200904
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 11:30
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 157
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 555
50% 421 Pts
64-Core 795
49% 795 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 6.25
6% 7.15 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.87
Splatting 0.09
3% 4.35 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S2000 512GB
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 607 443 489 659 278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
146% Outstanding
Read 1,400
Write 1,307
Mixed 861
SusWrite 512
228% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 20.1
117% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 632
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 357
322% 492 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 146%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WJD16G8M08N2666 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25.4
82% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,831 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback