Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 25 '20 at 15:40
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 142
2-Core 277
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 661
73% 578 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 7.9
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.2 fps
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 0.3
3% 4.55 fps
Poor: 4% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S2000 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0828A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1375 1447 1427 1472 1483 1331 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,934
Write 1,583
Mixed 1,154
SusWrite 1,422
341% 1,524 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 28.8
197% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 944
DQ Mixed 548
512% 788 MB/s
Poor: 146%
This bench: 261%
Great: 261%
JetFlash Transcend 64GB
10GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 14 12 15 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
8.29% Terrible
Read 34.4
Write 4.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 13
17% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.29%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WJD16G8M08N2666 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 11.5
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback