Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160303
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateNov 11 '20 at 18:55
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 195
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 377
48% 364 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 130
Sapphire(174B 9440) 1.5GB
Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.37
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 1.12
3% 3.41 fps
MRender 5.76
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 3.87
3% 4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Taisu SSD256G 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 5.8 71 15 4.1 9.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.3% Average
Read 453
Write 366
Mixed 327
SusWrite 54
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 63.4
DQ Write 4.2
DQ Mixed 0.3
9% 22.6 MB/s
Tph00402 999GB 0 3TB
856GB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 123 124 125 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 132
Write 147
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 124
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 87%
External USB 3.0 3TB
550GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 172 171 173 177 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
Read 159
Write 159
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 173
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 101%
SAMSUNG HD103UI 1TB
409GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 38 52 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.4% Below average
Read 87.8
Write 44.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 49.2
69% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
111% 1.27 MB/s
ST350031 2CS 500GB
2GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 49.5
105% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 43%
ST332031 0CS 320GB
143GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 62 60 50 30 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.7% Poor
Read 53.5
Write 52.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 51.3
63% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 31%
ST310005 20AS 1TB
561GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 24 8.5 21 30 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 90.5
Write 47.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 18.7
60% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 38%
Seagate External Drive 160GB
103GB free, PID 0503
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 32
Write 32
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 30
40% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-D3H Builds (Compare 2,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-D3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $331
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback