Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190823
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
69% 122 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 351
50% 365 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
PNY(196E 0995) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 29
18% 25.4 fps
MRender 32.2
Gravity 22
Splatting 24.3
21% 26.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,383
Write 1,392
Mixed 820
266% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 33.8
151% 58.5 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 497
DQ Mixed 481
379% 526 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 248%
Adata SU740 500GB
71GB free
Firmware: N200409a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 200
Write 231
Mixed 209
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 27.3
4K Mixed 20.5
63% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 133
103% 137 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 109%
ST1000VM 002-1CT162 1TB
898GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 2.7 3.6 2.2 2.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.6% Poor
Read 162
Write 185
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 3.3
135% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 29%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 74 75 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 77.5
128% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 47%
ST332031 0CS 320GB
297GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 74 75 76 75 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.4% Below average
Read 88.2
Write 93
Mixed 46.7
SusWrite 68.1
98% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
ST350041 0AS 500GB
466GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 74 75 76 75 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.4% Average
Read 120
Write 114
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 77.6
117% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
98% 1.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.5% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback