Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime16.8 Days
Run DateNov 14 '20 at 21:37
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 65.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 277
84% 160 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 819
83% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,044
65% 1,044 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
EVGA(3842 6698) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 451.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20
Reflection 23.1
Parallax 18.8
16% 20.6 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 20
Splatting 26.1
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
724GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1477 818 829 827 821 831 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,585
Write 1,780
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 934
321% 1,427 MB/s
4K Read 51.1
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 72.4
258% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 946
DQ Write 710
DQ Mixed 890
648% 848 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 237%
Great: 276%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
19GB free
Firmware: R0105A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 495
Write 394
Mixed 404
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 28
126% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 49.6
70% 129 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 298 299 299 299 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 445
Mixed 398
SusWrite 315
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 87.8
4K Mixed 55
181% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
136GB free
Firmware: V8X01c45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 359 368 368 367 367 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 434
Write 358
Mixed 336
SusWrite 366
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 32.6
119% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 173
128% 167 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 24.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 23.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $944
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback