Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Memory 9.56 1-Core 31.2 2-Core 54.8 16% 31.9 Pts	4-Core 79.1 8-Core 59.6 10% 69.3 Pts	64-Core 52.1 3% 52.1 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 14.3 Parallax 17 15% 16.5 fps	MRender 14.9 Gravity 17.3 Splatting 18.7 14% 17 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 15%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gamer L TA1D0240A 240GB 1,013 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM81.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 187 241 227 205 205 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.1% Below average	Read 161 Write 147 Mixed 142 SusWrite 210 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 5.9 4K Write 14.3 4K Mixed 5.6 24% 8.6 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 156 148% 229 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G4DFS824A.C8FE 1x4GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 408 10% 408 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	206x
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	162x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	138x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $359

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16