Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	162% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte AX370M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180208
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	74%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104 181,631 User benchmarks, average bench 60% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 35.4 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 81 41% 67.8 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 334 38% 299 Pts	64-Core 357 22% 357 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Lighting 63.5 Reflection 57 Parallax 51.8 52% 57.4 fps	MRender 51.4 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 47.9 40% 49.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59 34,063 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: SS0328D Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 248 251 254 257 261 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,776 Write 259 Mixed 170 SusWrite 250 131% 614 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 54.1 173% 58.1 MB/s	DQ Read 696 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 409 325% 464 MB/s
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 271%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 652GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 191 196 197 195 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 177 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 192 117% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 37,374 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	62.9% Good	MC Read 25 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 24 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 8.6 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370M-Gaming 3-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	37x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 2400GAMD $135Bench 63%, 127,344 samples	15x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	13x

SSD
A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GBKingston $53Bench 108%, 30,265 samples	7x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	8x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $374

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16