HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 06:43
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 339
47% 346 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8490
HP(103C 90B8) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.1001
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.77% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.8
0% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 0.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft virtueller Datenträger 129GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 20 18 17 22 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 22.5
Write 52.5
Mixed 52
SusWrite 19.4
28% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
279GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 21 18 17 22 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 56.7
Write 60.8
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 21.9
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback