Asus H61M-A/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H61M-A/BR (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140624
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '20 at 21:27
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 194 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 382 8-Core 353 50% 368 Pts	64-Core 380 24% 380 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.7% Poor	Lighting 36 Reflection 40.5 Parallax 37.5 29% 38 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 27 27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 255 Write 233 Mixed 231 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 24.3 95% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 209 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 0.5 55% 134 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 226GB free Firmware: HP34 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 129 Write 130 Mixed 67.1 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 196GB free Firmware: HP73 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 111 Write 65.5 Mixed 55.2 57% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 286GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 59.5 Write 61.6 Mixed 46.5 42% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-016.A00LF 0194 SH564128FH8N6TNSQG 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-A/BR Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/BR

CPU
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	74x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	70x
Core i3-3250IntelBench 59%, 4,164 samples	54x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	121x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	29x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	19x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	10x
99U5403-159.A01LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 987 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16