Today's hottest deals

HP xw6400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP xw6400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A04h
Memory2 GB free of 6.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '20 at 13:55
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5345
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 27
2-Core 53.9
33% 48.2 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 214
19% 161 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 3973) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.3% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 66.3
Parallax 58.8
51% 62.6 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 52.6
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 96 91 82 115 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 168
Write 213
Mixed 207
SusWrite 97.8
39% 171 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 32.1
96% 33.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 130
107% 154 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
867GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 106 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 112
Write 119
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 108
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 39GB
null MHz
4096, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.8
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw6400 Workstation Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw6400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback