MSI MS-17G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GS75 Stealth 9SF
MotherboardMSI MS-17G1  (all builds)
Memory51.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200518
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 19:46
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 75.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 248
81% 149 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 699
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 857
53% 857 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 135
Parallax 245
102% 168 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 135
Splatting 93.1
88% 108 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 273 314 323 341 339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 161
Write 1,163
Mixed 344
SusWrite 320
114% 497 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 22.8
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 532
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 197
184% 296 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 303%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT303.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1195 898 846 878 836 829 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 984
Write 1,366
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 914
243% 1,075 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 44.9
140% 45.7 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 204
202% 331 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 157%
Great: 303%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: RVT22B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 30 37 37 39 39 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 83% Great: 133%
H/W RAID 0 (Striping) 32TB
10.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 132 147 152 158 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 55.1
Write 129
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 147
134% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.4
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 86%
WD My Book Duo 0A10 16TB
11.5TB free, PID 0a10
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 133 148 152 157 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 237
Write 106
Mixed 114
SusWrite 148
187% 151 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
136% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 26.2
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 22.5
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17G1 Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback