Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230426
Uptime11.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 17:49
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 190
2-Core 383
119% 223 Pts
4-Core 740
8-Core 1,317
124% 1,028 Pts
64-Core 1,720
106% 1,720 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 117%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 145
Parallax 214
108% 164 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 152
Splatting 96.9
98% 123 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,252
Write 551
Mixed 542
171% 782 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 49.2
224% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 559
469% 692 MB/s
Poor: 122% Great: 296%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3161 3153 3140 3061 3156 3159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
459% Outstanding
Read 2,653
Write 3,157
Mixed 2,903
SusWrite 3,138
671% 2,963 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 78.9
279% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 1,810
DQ Write 1,603
DQ Mixed 1716
1,284% 1,710 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 459%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6000 C30 2x16GB-$105
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
199% Outstanding
MC Read 78.5
MC Write 67.2
MC Mixed 74.3
210% 73.3 GB/s
SC Read 53.6
SC Write 61.9
SC Mixed 58.6
166% 58 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 145%
This bench: 199%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 272%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 278%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $1,320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback